One of the initial investors and backers of OpenAI, the organization that developed ChatGPT, was Elon Musk. However, he now believes that Microsoft is effectively in control of the closed-source, maximum-profit company—not what he intended.
According to tech tycoon Elon Musk, ChatGPT shows how far artificial intelligence has come and why we should all be concerned. The tech tycoon now asserts that OpenAI’s ChatGPT does not live up to his expectations.
Musk said at the World Government Summit in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, “AI is one of the greatest threats to the survival of humanity” shortly after discussing the creation of ChatGPT.

Musk added, “It has great, great potential, incredible capacity, and is both good and bad.” However, “with that comes huge peril,” he added.

The connection between Musk and ChatGPT was brought up when the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter was asked how he expected technology to change in ten years.

Musk is one of the co-founders of OpenAI, a company based in the United States that developed ChatGPT, a so-called generative AI tool that provides responses to user requests that are human-like.

The GPT-3 big language model underpins ChatGPT, an advanced form of artificial intelligence. It is designed to recognize human speech and offer responses based on a lot of data.

Read also: Slavery in neocolonialism: Elon Musk was aware that “ChatGPT has demonstrated to people precisely how advanced AI has grown,” and that it was developed using Kenyan workers as AI guinea pigs. AI has been getting better for some time. It simply lacked a user interface that the majority of people could use.

He continued, “AI does not currently have any laws or regulations in place to restrict its growth.” This is in contrast to pharmaceuticals, aircraft, and vehicles, which are required to adhere to regulatory safety standards.

Musk made the observation, “To be honest, I think we need to regulate AI safety.” It is, in my opinion, more dangerous to civilization than cars, airplanes, or medicine.

Musk made the observation that regulation “may slow down AI a little bit, but I believe that would be a good thing.”

The businessman has warned about the dangers of unchecked AI development for a long time. He has stated that artificial intelligence is “much more deadly” than nuclear weapons in the past.

His comments are more significant now that ChatGPT’s more complex, human-like writing threatens to shake up the employment market.

Leaving OpenAI Musk resigned from the company’s board of directors in 2018 and no longer owns any shares.

It began as an open-source charitable organization. For-profit and closed-source, it is now. I am not a board member, have no open investment in OpenAI, and have no authority over it.

Read also: According to Musk, the fact that “Google was not paying enough attention to AI safety” influenced Musk’s decision to start OpenAI. Microsoft invests more than $10 billion in the parent organization of ChatGPT.

Musk has made it clear that “TruthGPT” is what we require.
ChatGPT has sparked a heated debate between Microsoft, which has invested in OpenAI and integrated its technology into its Bing web browser, and Google, the internet search giant.

Read also: The AI War: Google’s AI search bot, Bard, officially replaces ChatGPT. In response to ChatGPT, Google developed its own alternative program. The company is catching up as investors debate whether ChatGPT will challenge Google’s dominance in web search.

This is not Musk’s first warning about AI and its dangers. Recently, there have been a lot of exaggerated claims about AI. On the subject, Elon has also been bombastic. He once stated, “AI may be more destructive than nuclear weapons.”

Elon’s remarks are significant, regardless of how you feel about them. He has 160 million followers on Twitter, which has allowed him to skyrocket the value of his cryptocurrency while his own stock has fallen. His account of AI will help shape people’s perceptions of the technology.

This doesn’t always mean bad things. It is essential to emphasize that Musk is not opposed to AI per se; rather, he is opposed to the absence of regulation and human oversight that may result from the rush to dominate this new industry.